POLI 100E, Interest Group Politics: Topics 3 and 4

Mancur Olsen's The Logic of Collective Action
- Olsen's The Logic of Collective Action was published in
1965 at the height of pluralism and his criticisms of the
group basis of politics immediately changed the terms
of the debate.
- Olsen challenged the idea that individuals with common
interests would automatically form groups to take
collective action to defend and/or advance their interests.
Olsen argued that there were three basic problems with
this theory of group behavior:
- Free Riding -- Members of a group
enjoy the benefits
of the group activity whether or not they contribute.
- Coordination -- If there are multiple objectives --
a very common occurrence -- then the members
of a group may have difficulty coordinating on the
objectives.
- Conflict of Interest -- Group members may not agree
on what should be the primary goal of the group.
- These problems are particularly severe for large
groups because:
- Anonymity -- Large groups tend to be anonymous
so it is difficult to forge a group identity.
- A Single Individual's contribution is less important.
- Enforcement -- In a large, anonymous group it is hard
to know who has and has not contributed!
- Small Groups are less likely to encounter these problems
because:
- Less Anonymity -- Members are more vulnerable to
interpersonal persuasion.
- A single Individual's contribution is more significant.
- Enforcement is possible: Those who do and do not
contribute to the group effort are usually known.
- Olsen's By-Product Theory -- Large groups are able
to get members to contribute by offering them both
collective and private (selective) benefits. Hence, the
achievement of the group's goals are in part a by-product
of the provision of private benefits.
These private benefits or selective incentives include
discounts at hotels and motels (AARP), coffee mugs
and sweatshirts (NPR), and so on.
- Olsen's Theory does not take into account the role of:
- Leaders or more broadly Political Entrepreneurs --
Leaders and leadership institutions increase the
activity level of a group and the level of cooperation.
Leaders, because of perks or
nonmaterial glory will
bear the costs of organizing and expending effort to
monitor potential free-riders so that group goals are
achieved.
- Ideology -- Members of group contribute because
their belief system makes participating in group
activities a priority whether or not they receive
selective benefits.
