SENATE_36 Rank Ordering

The format of the rank order files is:


 1.  Rank
 2.  Congress Number
 3.  ICPSR ID Number:  5 digit code assigned by the ICPSR as 
                       corrected by Howard Rosenthal and myself.
 4.  State Code:  2 digit ICPSR State Code. 
 5.  Congressional District Number (if House)
 6.  State Name
 7.  Party Code:  100 = Dem., 200 = Repub. (See PARTY3.DAT)
 8.  Name of Member
 9.  First Dimension DW-NOMINATE Joint Scaling
10.  Second Dimension DW-NOMINATE Joint Scaling
11.  Log-Likelihood
12.  Total Choices this Congress
13.  Geometric Mean Probability
14.  Proportion Correctly Classified

Rank Orderings for all Houses and Senates Can be Found Here


   1  36  3192 41 ALABAMA  100 FITZPATRICK -0.732  0.680   -87.79903  351  0.779  0.875
   2  36 10093 49 TEXAS    100 WIGFALL  L. -0.665 -0.468  -120.89275  385  0.731  0.852
   3  36  1808 41 ALABAMA  100 CLAY  C. C. -0.638  0.770   -40.96012  181  0.797  0.912
   4  36  4833 44 GEORGIA  100 IVERSON  A. -0.634 -0.062  -138.26862  342  0.667  0.819
   5  36  2393 46 MISSISS  100 DAVIS  J.   -0.623  0.482   -99.26137  318  0.732  0.865
   6  36  5444 72 OREGON   100 LANE  J.    -0.619 -0.524  -138.87430  523  0.767  0.889
   7  36  4759 40 VIRGINI  100 HUNTER  R.  -0.586  0.795  -106.14304  463  0.795  0.898
   8  36 10462 43 FLORIDA  100 YULEE  D. L -0.582  0.491   -60.04803  201  0.742  0.851
   9  36  3780 34 MISSOUR  100 GREEN  J. S -0.579 -0.249  -158.03270  448  0.703  0.828
  10  36  6053 40 VIRGINI  100 MASON  J. M -0.574  0.703  -111.51677  447  0.779  0.888
  11  36  7509 34 MISSOUR  100 POLK  T.    -0.559 -0.417  -155.77127  451  0.708  0.838
  12  36  7572 51 KENTUCK  100 POWELL  L.  -0.531  0.331  -130.24026  534  0.784  0.899
  13  36  8223 11 DELAWAR  100 SAULSBURY   -0.523  0.309  -100.04668  290  0.708  0.841
  14  36  4296 49 TEXAS    100 HEMPHILL  J -0.497 -0.464  -170.36732  496  0.709  0.835
  15  36  8575 45 LOUISIA  100 SLIDELL  J. -0.497  0.177   -63.74978  258  0.781  0.899
  16  36  4007 48 SOUTH C  100 HAMMOND  J. -0.494  0.826   -67.19355  215  0.732  0.833
  17  36  1686 48 SOUTH C  100 CHESNUT  J. -0.492  0.258   -71.43684  264  0.763  0.871
  18  36  5942 43 FLORIDA  100 MALLORY  S. -0.480  0.121   -76.76418  224  0.710  0.835
  19  36  4198 71 CALIFOR  100 HAUN  H. P. -0.468 -0.724   -11.72594   42  0.756  0.833
  20  36  7854 33 MINNESO  100 RICE  H. M. -0.451 -0.748  -192.74855  486  0.673  0.805
  21  36  1038 22 INDIANA  100 BRIGHT  J.  -0.450 -0.591  -124.62834  400  0.732  0.865
  22  36  7643 24 OHIO     100 PUGH  G. E. -0.436 -0.900  -143.65807  286  0.605  0.717
  23  36  6921 54 TENNESS  100 NICHOLSON   -0.432 -0.181  -160.14076  502  0.727  0.857
  24  36   968 47 NORTH C  100 BRAGG  T.   -0.428  0.516  -154.35667  553  0.756  0.868
  25  36  1095 46 MISSISS  100 BROWN  A. G -0.425  0.145  -170.74828  305  0.571  0.695
  26  36  8339 42 ARKANSA  100 SEBASTIAN   -0.424 -0.019  -112.88478  431  0.770  0.891
  27  36  4990 42 ARKANSA  100 JOHNSON  R. -0.423  0.252  -106.91164  376  0.753  0.875
  28  36  3887 71 CALIFOR  100 GWIN  W. M. -0.382 -0.358  -135.39322  417  0.723  0.854
  29  36  4940 54 TENNESS  100 JOHNSON  A. -0.357 -0.098  -251.94406  499  0.604  0.749
  30  36   525 11 DELAWAR  100 BAYARD  J.  -0.355  0.588   -69.05542  282  0.783  0.883
  31  36   709 14 PENNSYL  100 BIGLER  W.  -0.353 -0.368  -175.99002  484  0.695  0.853
  32  36  3177 22 INDIANA  100 FITCH  G. N -0.347 -0.219  -170.18221  437  0.677  0.810
  33  36  9423 44 GEORGIA  100 TOOMBS  R.  -0.346  0.938   -95.19059  259  0.692  0.822
  34  36  9352 12 NEW JER  100 THOMSON  J. -0.270  0.073  -100.95121  248  0.666  0.819
  35  36  2692 21 ILLINOI  100 DOUGLAS  S. -0.265 -0.558  -117.39780  269  0.646  0.796
  36  36  5177 52 MARYLAN  310 KENNEDY  A. -0.248  0.171  -123.59817  392  0.730  0.849
  37  36   627 45 LOUISIA  100 BENJAMIN  J -0.247  0.398   -54.82977  232  0.790  0.914
  38  36  1846 47 NORTH C  100 CLINGMAN  T -0.236  0.554  -137.62340  443  0.733  0.853
  39  36  5490 71 CALIFOR  100 LATHAM  M.  -0.204  0.153  -212.79640  444  0.619  0.748
  40  36  7282 52 MARYLAN  100 PEARCE  J.  -0.060  0.868  -142.22272  388  0.693  0.822
  41  36  2668 25 WISCONS  200 DOOLITTLE    0.005 -0.653  -158.51935  525  0.739  0.832
  42  36  2181 51 KENTUCK  310 CRITTENDEN   0.040  0.637  -159.31940  383  0.660  0.815
  43  36  5269 13 NEW YOR  200 KING  P.     0.058 -0.998  -170.03183  479  0.701  0.812
  44  36   718 23 MICHIGA  200 BINGHAM  K.  0.068 -0.998  -167.48674  489  0.710  0.804
  45  36  9255 12 NEW JER  200 TEN EYCK  J  0.106 -0.762  -108.72060  477  0.796  0.895
  46  36   361 72 OREGON   200 BAKER  E. D  0.117  0.074   -65.21214  160  0.665  0.800
  47  36  2617  1 CONNECT  200 DIXON  J.    0.121 -0.243  -124.23125  443  0.755  0.853
  48  36  9492 21 ILLINOI  200 TRUMBULL  L  0.137 -0.125  -178.37880  521  0.710  0.835
  49  36  3922  4 NEW HAM  200 HALE  J. P.  0.149 -0.989  -156.34082  471  0.718  0.820
  50  36  3310  1 CONNECT  200 FOSTER  L.   0.170 -0.844  -133.81563  517  0.772  0.859
  51  36  3834 31 IOWA     200 GRIMES  J.   0.183 -0.024  -176.82573  497  0.701  0.847
  52  36  1940  6 VERMONT  200 COLLAMER  J  0.216 -0.164   -91.42592  403  0.797  0.906
  53  36  4001  2 MAINE    200 HAMLIN  H.   0.234 -0.972   -66.11861  244  0.763  0.869
  54  36  3127  2 MAINE    200 FESSENDEN    0.272 -0.514  -126.97928  508  0.779  0.880
  55  36  2793 25 WISCONS  200 DURKEE  C.   0.287 -0.958   -87.88801  439  0.819  0.909
  56  36  3256  6 VERMONT  200 FOOT  S.     0.291 -0.066  -129.20168  509  0.776  0.892
  57  36  1437 14 PENNSYL  200 CAMERON  S.  0.291 -0.118  -108.35031  309  0.704  0.828
  58  36  1759  4 NEW HAM  200 CLARK  D.    0.309 -0.849  -107.41789  491  0.804  0.908
  59  36  8378 13 NEW YOR  200 SEWARD  W.   0.310 -0.296  -100.30823  329  0.737  0.842
  60  36   212  5 RHODE I  200 ANTHONY  H.  0.317 -0.704  -135.38661  496  0.761  0.865
  61  36  6697  2 MAINE    200 MORRILL  L.  0.327 -0.559   -25.89252  163  0.853  0.933
  62  36  8516  5 RHODE I  200 SIMMONS  J.  0.343 -0.235  -104.86656  497  0.810  0.897
  63  36  1057 71 CALIFOR  100 BRODERICK    0.343  0.895   -11.16743   31  0.698  0.903
  64  36 10225  3 MASSACH  200 WILSON  H.   0.353 -0.223  -157.28876  552  0.752  0.861
  65  36  4077 31 IOWA     200 HARLAN  J.   0.354  0.179  -135.83604  528  0.773  0.869
  66  36  9083  3 MASSACH  200 SUMNER  C.   0.371 -0.242  -105.81458  484  0.804  0.905
  67  36 10121 33 MINNESO  200 WILKINSON    0.421  0.521  -129.43735  422  0.736  0.853
  68  36  9698 24 OHIO     200 WADE  B. F.  0.604  0.118  -109.46501  536  0.815  0.903
  69  36  1642 23 MICHIGA  200 CHANDLER  Z  0.621  0.129  -104.56746  527  0.820  0.920


Site Links

VOTEVIEW Blog
NOMINATE Data, Roll Call Data, and Software
Course Web Pages: University of Georgia (2010 - )
Course Web Pages: UC San Diego (2004 - 2010)
University of San Diego Law School (2005)
Course Web Pages: University of Houston (2000 - 2005)
Course Web Pages: Carnegie-Mellon University (1997 - 2000)
Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting
Recent Working Papers
Analyses of Recent Politics
About This Website
K7MOA Log Books: 1960 - 2013
Bio of Keith T. Poole
Related Links