SENATE_27 Rank Ordering

The format of the rank order files is:


 1.  Rank
 2.  Congress Number
 3.  ICPSR ID Number:  5 digit code assigned by the ICPSR as 
                       corrected by Howard Rosenthal and myself.
 4.  State Code:  2 digit ICPSR State Code. 
 5.  Congressional District Number (if House)
 6.  State Name
 7.  Party Code:  100 = Dem., 200 = Repub. (See PARTY3.DAT)
 8.  Name of Member
 9.  First Dimension DW-NOMINATE Joint Scaling
10.  Second Dimension DW-NOMINATE Joint Scaling
11.  Log-Likelihood
12.  Total Choices this Congress
13.  Geometric Mean Probability
14.  Proportion Correctly Classified

Rank Orderings for all Houses and Senates Can be Found Here


   1  27  6381 21 ILLINOI  100 MCROBERTS   -0.694 -0.188   -61.58332  627  0.906  0.957
   2  27  8373 42 ARKANSA  100 SEVIER      -0.621  0.487  -126.98708  663  0.826  0.916
   3  27  6770 45 LOUISIA  100 MOUTON      -0.613  0.248   -31.66432  261  0.886  0.935
   4  27  3411 42 ARKANSA  100 FULTON      -0.606  0.435  -117.02763  761  0.857  0.934
   5  27  9753 46 MISSISS  100 WALKER      -0.601  0.477  -171.17871  693  0.781  0.857
   6  27  5689 34 MISSOUR  100 LINN        -0.576  0.195  -143.70781  706  0.816  0.891
   7  27 10453 21 ILLINOI  100 YOUNG       -0.575  0.437  -130.43085  679  0.825  0.918
   8  27   334 41 ALABAMA  100 BAGBY       -0.538  0.166   -82.42790  359  0.795  0.891
   9  27  1809 41 ALABAMA  100 CLAY  C.C.  -0.482  0.115   -32.25118  316  0.903  0.959
  10  27  7435  4 NEW HAM  100 PIERCE      -0.438 -0.356   -19.10063  259  0.929  0.965
  11  27  6921 54 TENNESS  100 NICHOLSON   -0.432 -0.181   -24.39332  260  0.910  0.958
  12  27 10398 13 NEW YOR  100 WRIGHT      -0.421 -0.423   -88.87674  668  0.875  0.940
  13  27  5275 41 ALABAMA  100 KING        -0.386 -0.045  -140.91176  729  0.824  0.907
  14  27   130 24 OHIO     100 ALLEN       -0.383 -0.781   -61.18559  731  0.920  0.971
  15  27  8675  1 CONNECT  100 SMITH  P.   -0.374 -0.768   -62.85867  598  0.900  0.958
  16  27  2284 44 GEORGIA  100 CUTHBERT    -0.344  0.000  -100.30335  509  0.821  0.914
  17  27  9177 24 OHIO     100 TAPPAN      -0.317 -0.949   -90.07164  703  0.880  0.945
  18  27   658 34 MISSOUR  100 BENTON      -0.305 -0.311  -153.39388  788  0.823  0.898
  19  27 10341  4 NEW HAM  100 WOODBURY    -0.305 -0.320   -96.93804  714  0.873  0.954
  20  27  6232 48 SOUTH C  100 MCDUFFIE    -0.298  0.453   -27.01833   77  0.704  0.831
  21  27  9061 14 PENNSYL  100 STURGEON    -0.275 -0.279  -202.47067  644  0.730  0.835
  22  27  7929 40 VIRGINI   29 RIVES       -0.248  0.650  -195.90605  528  0.690  0.831
  23  27  4309 46 MISSISS   29 HENDERSON   -0.235  0.659  -237.40555  563  0.656  0.769
  24  27  1186 14 PENNSYL  100 BUCHANAN    -0.232 -0.162  -202.02049  659  0.736  0.836
  25  27 10174  2 MAINE    100 WILLIAMS    -0.223 -0.478   -92.13747  503  0.833  0.917
  26  27 10103  4 NEW HAM  100 WILCOX      -0.211 -0.658   -66.91921  318  0.810  0.909
  27  27   225 40 VIRGINI   29 ARCHER      -0.182  0.775  -225.29803  714  0.729  0.849
  28  27  1418 48 SOUTH C  100 CALHOUN     -0.172 -0.315  -192.26361  628  0.736  0.849
  29  27  9172 13 NEW YOR   29 TALLMADGE   -0.162  0.810  -290.56305  714  0.666  0.780
  30  27   669 44 GEORGIA   29 BERRIEN     -0.154  0.743  -213.43954  709  0.740  0.859
  31  27  3739 47 NORTH C   29 GRAHAM      -0.051  0.632  -193.07881  719  0.764  0.868
  32  27  5952 47 NORTH C   29 MANGUM      -0.039  0.334  -206.08719  731  0.754  0.876
  33  27  6427 52 MARYLAN   29 MERRICK     -0.027  0.919  -124.31818  623  0.819  0.900
  34  27  7608 48 SOUTH C   29 PRESTON      0.011  0.172  -214.29146  540  0.672  0.772
  35  27  2181 51 KENTUCK   29 CRITTENDEN   0.029  0.676   -88.17718  344  0.774  0.890
  36  27   469 45 LOUISIA   29 BARROW       0.044  0.397  -185.69041  687  0.763  0.888
  37  27  2004 45 LOUISIA   29 CONRAD       0.059  0.998   -74.79287  362  0.813  0.898
  38  27  5209 52 MARYLAN   29 KERR         0.120  0.677   -79.47974  538  0.863  0.924
  39  27   527 11 DELAWAR   29 BAYARD       0.124  0.349  -150.11815  628  0.787  0.895
  40  27  8674 22 INDIANA   29 SMITH O.H.   0.179  0.041  -216.82635  801  0.763  0.869
  41  27  6666 51 KENTUCK   29 MOREHEAD     0.234  0.318  -103.31348  683  0.860  0.941
  42  27 99878 99 USA       29 TYLER        0.245 -0.969   -17.32078   36  0.618  0.833
  43  27  7404  6 VERMONT   29 PHELPS       0.263  0.080  -126.90682  539  0.790  0.905
  44  27 10005 22 INDIANA   29 WHITE        0.271 -0.237  -175.57579  701  0.778  0.880
  45  27  8805  5 RHODE I   29 SPRAGUE      0.283 -0.473   -72.09922  329  0.803  0.921
  46  27  1810 51 KENTUCK   29 CLAY  H.     0.284  0.604   -27.59352  350  0.924  0.963
  47  27  8516  5 RHODE I   29 SIMMONS      0.324 -0.240   -76.29946  607  0.882  0.947
  48  27  2128  6 VERMONT   29 CRAFTS       0.325 -0.562  -120.77229  362  0.716  0.820
  49  27  7531 23 MICHIGA   29 PORTER       0.334 -0.300  -154.29161  714  0.806  0.901
  50  27  2622  5 RHODE I   29 DIXON        0.362  0.069   -25.51894  294  0.917  0.959
  51  27  1711  3 MASSACH   29 CHOATE       0.367 -0.127  -116.40594  656  0.837  0.919
  52  27  2441 12 NEW JER   29 DAYTON       0.389  0.288   -39.92481  254  0.855  0.917
  53  27  6486 12 NEW JER   29 MILLER       0.398  0.248   -94.88071  755  0.882  0.950
  54  27  1825 11 DELAWAR   29 CLAYTON      0.434 -0.257  -181.49118  744  0.784  0.887
  55  27  7600  6 VERMONT   29 PRENTISS     0.473 -0.091   -66.78283  322  0.813  0.898
  56  27  4768  1 CONNECT   29 HUNTINGTON   0.490 -0.033   -78.24565  691  0.893  0.952
  57  27 10339 23 MICHIGA   29 WOODBRIDGE   0.565 -0.664  -169.90807  687  0.781  0.876
  58  27  3007  2 MAINE     29 EVANS        0.592 -0.018  -108.88782  775  0.869  0.923
  59  27  8752 12 NEW JER   29 SOUTHARD     0.626  0.593   -20.32219  317  0.938  0.978
  60  27   513  3 MASSACH   29 BATES        0.647 -0.152  -106.76534  753  0.868  0.934


Site Links

VOTEVIEW Blog
NOMINATE Data, Roll Call Data, and Software
Course Web Pages: University of Georgia (2010 - )
Course Web Pages: UC San Diego (2004 - 2010)
University of San Diego Law School (2005)
Course Web Pages: University of Houston (2000 - 2005)
Course Web Pages: Carnegie-Mellon University (1997 - 2000)
Analyzing Spatial Models of Choice and Judgment with R
Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting
Recent Working Papers
Analyses of Recent Politics
About This Website
K7MOA Log Books: 1960 - 2015
Bio of Keith T. Poole
Related Links