SENATE_SORT27 Rank Ordering

The format of the rank order files is:


 1.  Rank
 2.  Congress Number
 3.  ICPSR ID Number:  5 digit code assigned by the ICPSR as 
                       corrected by Howard Rosenthal and myself.
 4.  State Code:  2 digit ICPSR State Code. 
 5.  Congressional District Number (if House)
 6.  State Name
 7.  Party Code:  100 = Dem., 200 = Repub. (See PARTY3.DAT)
 8.  Name of Member
 9.  First Dimension DW-NOMINATE Joint Scaling
10.  Second Dimension DW-NOMINATE Joint Scaling
11.  Log-Likelihood
12.  Total Choices this Congress
13.  Geometric Mean Probability
14.  Proportion Correctly Classified

Rank Orderings for all Houses and Senates Can be Found Here


   1  27  6381 21 ILLINOI  100 MCROBERTS   -0.709 -0.203   -62.04827  627  0.906  0.959
   2  27  8373 42 ARKANSA  100 SEVIER      -0.630  0.482  -126.88811  663  0.826  0.917
   3  27  6770 45 LOUISIA  100 MOUTON      -0.622  0.244   -31.29579  261  0.887  0.939
   4  27  3411 42 ARKANSA  100 FULTON      -0.615  0.431  -116.35559  761  0.858  0.933
   5  27  9753 46 MISSISS  100 WALKER      -0.598  0.471  -172.17001  693  0.780  0.863
   6  27  5689 34 MISSOUR  100 LINN        -0.585  0.190  -143.89394  706  0.816  0.892
   7  27 10453 21 ILLINOI  100 YOUNG       -0.575  0.437  -130.85397  679  0.825  0.918
   8  27   334 41 ALABAMA  100 BAGBY       -0.543  0.154   -82.20560  359  0.795  0.889
   9  27  1809 41 ALABAMA  100 CLAY  C.C.  -0.491  0.112   -32.39070  316  0.903  0.953
  10  27  7435  4 NEW HAM  100 PIERCE      -0.438 -0.356   -19.20847  259  0.929  0.961
  11  27  6921 54 TENNESS  100 NICHOLSON   -0.432 -0.181   -24.50135  260  0.910  0.958
  12  27 10398 13 NEW YOR  100 WRIGHT      -0.421 -0.423   -89.50017  668  0.875  0.946
  13  27  5275 41 ALABAMA  100 KING        -0.386 -0.045  -141.41364  729  0.824  0.911
  14  27   130 24 OHIO     100 ALLEN       -0.383 -0.781   -61.86417  731  0.919  0.973
  15  27  8675  1 CONNECT  100 SMITH  P.   -0.373 -0.778   -63.53532  598  0.899  0.960
  16  27  2284 44 GEORGIA  100 CUTHBERT    -0.344  0.000  -101.12528  509  0.820  0.912
  17  27  9177 24 OHIO     100 TAPPAN      -0.319 -0.948   -91.12784  703  0.878  0.943
  18  27 10341  4 NEW HAM  100 WOODBURY    -0.315 -0.322   -95.20581  714  0.875  0.952
  19  27   658 34 MISSOUR  100 BENTON      -0.305 -0.311  -154.43933  788  0.822  0.902
  20  27  6232 48 SOUTH C  100 MCDUFFIE    -0.292  0.445   -28.11380   77  0.694  0.818
  21  27  9061 14 PENNSYL  100 STURGEON    -0.284 -0.282  -204.82079  644  0.728  0.831
  22  27  7929 40 VIRGINI   29 RIVES       -0.248  0.650  -195.40219  528  0.691  0.822
  23  27  4309 46 MISSISS   29 HENDERSON   -0.238  0.646  -238.76460  563  0.654  0.773
  24  27  1186 14 PENNSYL  100 BUCHANAN    -0.232 -0.162  -201.61717  659  0.736  0.835
  25  27 10174  2 MAINE    100 WILLIAMS    -0.223 -0.478   -92.87659  503  0.831  0.915
  26  27 10103  4 NEW HAM  100 WILCOX      -0.210 -0.648   -67.00404  318  0.810  0.909
  27  27   225 40 VIRGINI   29 ARCHER      -0.182  0.775  -223.75404  714  0.731  0.840
  28  27  1418 48 SOUTH C  100 CALHOUN     -0.172 -0.315  -194.45987  628  0.734  0.850
  29  27  9172 13 NEW YOR   29 TALLMADGE   -0.161  0.804  -291.05798  714  0.665  0.789
  30  27   669 44 GEORGIA   29 BERRIEN     -0.150  0.734  -212.81140  709  0.741  0.865
  31  27  3739 47 NORTH C   29 GRAHAM      -0.052  0.635  -192.19080  719  0.765  0.868
  32  27  5952 47 NORTH C   29 MANGUM      -0.039  0.334  -205.26707  731  0.755  0.878
  33  27  6427 52 MARYLAN   29 MERRICK     -0.037  0.917  -125.62870  623  0.817  0.899
  34  27  7608 48 SOUTH C   29 PRESTON      0.001  0.172  -214.68387  540  0.672  0.767
  35  27  2181 51 KENTUCK   29 CRITTENDEN   0.027  0.686   -87.51816  344  0.775  0.892
  36  27   469 45 LOUISIA   29 BARROW       0.041  0.406  -186.95494  687  0.762  0.888
  37  27  2004 45 LOUISIA   29 CONRAD       0.064  0.998   -73.21478  362  0.817  0.898
  38  27  5209 52 MARYLAN   29 KERR         0.120  0.677   -79.95793  538  0.862  0.926
  39  27   527 11 DELAWAR   29 BAYARD       0.124  0.359  -150.68442  628  0.787  0.889
  40  27  8674 22 INDIANA   29 SMITH O.H.   0.178  0.031  -216.62314  801  0.763  0.868
  41  27  6666 51 KENTUCK   29 MOREHEAD     0.234  0.318  -104.25615  683  0.858  0.941
  42  27  7404  6 VERMONT   29 PHELPS       0.250  0.092  -128.17682  539  0.788  0.900
  43  27 99878 99 USA       29 TYLER        0.254 -0.967   -17.20034   36  0.620  0.750
  44  27 10005 22 INDIANA   29 WHITE        0.260 -0.233  -174.86089  701  0.779  0.880
  45  27  1810 51 KENTUCK   29 CLAY  H.     0.279  0.620   -28.37374  350  0.922  0.966
  46  27  8805  5 RHODE I   29 SPRAGUE      0.279 -0.456   -71.38636  329  0.805  0.921
  47  27  8516  5 RHODE I   29 SIMMONS      0.318 -0.222   -76.25096  607  0.882  0.947
  48  27  2128  6 VERMONT   29 CRAFTS       0.325 -0.561  -122.44164  362  0.713  0.820
  49  27  7531 23 MICHIGA   29 PORTER       0.333 -0.298  -153.36217  714  0.807  0.898
  50  27  1711  3 MASSACH   29 CHOATE       0.367 -0.127  -115.53399  656  0.839  0.919
  51  27  2622  5 RHODE I   29 DIXON        0.369  0.077   -25.51843  294  0.917  0.959
  52  27  2441 12 NEW JER   29 DAYTON       0.383  0.304   -40.15310  254  0.854  0.921
  53  27  6486 12 NEW JER   29 MILLER       0.390  0.253   -95.17405  755  0.882  0.951
  54  27  1825 11 DELAWAR   29 CLAYTON      0.436 -0.241  -181.89194  744  0.783  0.887
  55  27  7600  6 VERMONT   29 PRENTISS     0.482 -0.087   -66.41051  322  0.814  0.901
  56  27  4768  1 CONNECT   29 HUNTINGTON   0.489 -0.019   -77.79170  691  0.894  0.949
  57  27 10339 23 MICHIGA   29 WOODBRIDGE   0.565 -0.664  -169.42340  687  0.781  0.878
  58  27  3007  2 MAINE     29 EVANS        0.593 -0.008  -108.01545  775  0.870  0.923
  59  27  8752 12 NEW JER   29 SOUTHARD     0.636  0.594   -20.25500  317  0.938  0.981
  60  27   513  3 MASSACH   29 BATES        0.644 -0.146  -107.48149  753  0.867  0.934


Site Links

VOTEVIEW Blog
NOMINATE Data, Roll Call Data, and Software
Course Web Pages: University of Georgia (2010 - )
Course Web Pages: UC San Diego (2004 - 2010)
University of San Diego Law School (2005)
Course Web Pages: University of Houston (2000 - 2005)
Course Web Pages: Carnegie-Mellon University (1997 - 2000)
Analyzing Spatial Models of Choice and Judgment with R
Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting
Recent Working Papers
Analyses of Recent Politics
About This Website
K7MOA Log Books: 1960 - 2015
Bio of Keith T. Poole
Related Links