SENATE_17 Rank Ordering

The format of the rank order files is:


 1.  Rank
 2.  Congress Number
 3.  ICPSR ID Number:  5 digit code assigned by the ICPSR as 
                       corrected by Howard Rosenthal and myself.
 4.  State Code:  2 digit ICPSR State Code. 
 5.  Congressional District Number (if House)
 6.  State Name
 7.  Party Code:  100 = Dem., 200 = Repub. (See PARTY3.DAT)
 8.  Name of Member
 9.  First Dimension DW-NOMINATE Joint Scaling
10.  Second Dimension DW-NOMINATE Joint Scaling
11.  Log-Likelihood
12.  Total Choices this Congress
13.  Geometric Mean Probability
14.  Proportion Correctly Classified

Rank Orderings for all Houses and Senates Can be Found Here


   1  17  2828 54 TENNESS  200 EATON  J.H. -0.469  0.602   -41.69435   77  0.582  0.727
   2  17  5275 41 ALABAMA  200 KING  W.R.  -0.386 -0.045   -32.22134   79  0.665  0.848
   3  17  9749 41 ALABAMA  200 WALKER  J.  -0.323 -0.738   -25.43612   61  0.659  0.852
   4  17   658 34 MISSOUR  200 BENTON  T.  -0.305 -0.311   -40.81451   84  0.615  0.762
   5  17  5895 47 NORTH C  200 MACON  N.   -0.292 -0.956   -39.29372   86  0.633  0.744
   6  17   420 40 VIRGINI  200 BARBOUR  J. -0.221 -0.236   -39.11919   72  0.581  0.639
   7  17 10182 46 MISSISS  200 WILLIAMS    -0.199 -0.201   -37.03882   75  0.610  0.747
   8  17  4988 51 KENTUCK  200 JOHNSON  R. -0.187 -0.014   -30.24376   68  0.641  0.882
   9  17  4532 46 MISSISS  200 HOLMES  D.  -0.152 -0.111   -34.30438   80  0.651  0.837
  10  17  7486 40 VIRGINI  200 PLEASANTS   -0.135 -0.043   -31.04962   61  0.601  0.738
  11  17  3423 48 SOUTH C  200 GAILLARD    -0.135 -0.422   -37.57186   82  0.632  0.817
  12  17  8971 47 NORTH C  200 STOKES  M.  -0.128  0.297   -35.00599   77  0.635  0.792
  13  17  2913 44 GEORGIA  200 ELLIOTT  J. -0.092 -0.370   -24.93015   56  0.641  0.857
  14  17  2871 21 ILLINOI  200 EDWARDS  N. -0.087  0.996   -11.09032   56  0.820  0.946
  15  17 10160 54 TENNESS  200 WILLIAMS    -0.085  0.146   -35.06760   80  0.645  0.750
  16  17  9827 44 GEORGIA  200 WARE  N.    -0.065 -0.644   -32.45574   73  0.641  0.822
  17  17  4959 45 LOUISIA  200 JOHNSON  H. -0.037  0.261   -29.19519   84  0.706  0.905
  18  17  9233 22 INDIANA  200 TAYLOR  W.  -0.005  0.463   -47.64790   77  0.539  0.584
  19  17  5724 52 MARYLAN  200 LLOYD  E.   -0.004 -0.312   -30.64520   60  0.600  0.800
  20  17  3146 14 PENNSYL  200 FINDLAY  W.  0.036  0.241   -50.29532   83  0.546  0.651
  21  17  1111 45 LOUISIA  200 BROWN  J.    0.047  0.060   -33.61411   72  0.627  0.750
  22  17  2561 12 NEW JER  200 DICKERSON    0.113  0.119   -55.94275   84  0.514  0.619
  23  17  9595 13 NEW YOR  200 VANBUREN     0.140 -0.007   -42.99454   71  0.546  0.606
  24  17  9159 51 KENTUCK  200 TALBOT  I.   0.173  0.728   -33.15897   71  0.627  0.704
  25  17  8694 48 SOUTH C  200 SMITH  W.    0.193 -0.981   -37.14673   73  0.601  0.671
  26  17  1635  2 MAINE    200 CHANDLER     0.196 -0.162   -55.84031   86  0.522  0.547
  27  17  7216  4 NEW HAM  200 PARROTT  J.  0.222  0.032   -51.54121   84  0.541  0.726
  28  17  9297 21 ILLINOI  200 THOMAS  J.   0.254  0.723   -40.48664   82  0.610  0.671
  29  17  6941 22 INDIANA  200 NOBLE  J.    0.273  0.863   -40.28107   61  0.517  0.541
  30  17   495 34 MISSOUR  200 BARTON  D.   0.334  0.468   -51.64832   86  0.549  0.605
  31  17  4536  2 MAINE    200 HOLMES  J.   0.353  0.086   -42.23647   86  0.612  0.733
  32  17  1107 24 OHIO     200 BROWN  E.A.  0.354  0.935   -47.15448   82  0.563  0.683
  33  17  6693  4 NEW HAM  200 MORRIL  D.   0.372 -0.928   -23.52508   69  0.711  0.913
  34  17  9613 11 DELAWAR    1 VANDYKE  N.  0.421 -0.225   -37.44710   60  0.536  0.717
  35  17  8107 24 OHIO     200 RUGGLES  B.  0.440  0.898   -48.30778   74  0.521  0.527
  36  17   810  1 CONNECT  200 BOARDMAN     0.483 -0.875   -19.59129   57  0.709  0.895
  37  17  5339  5 RHODE I  200 KNIGHT  N.   0.502  0.346   -33.72844   71  0.622  0.732
  38  17  7182  6 VERMONT  200 PALMER  W.   0.543  0.376   -30.16281   63  0.620  0.794
  39  17  5270 13 NEW YOR    1 KING  R.     0.583 -0.304   -39.20248   80  0.613  0.675
  40  17  5817 14 PENNSYL  200 LOWRIE  W.   0.619  0.534   -36.30005   67  0.582  0.776
  41  17  8752 12 NEW JER  200 SOUTHARD     0.626  0.593   -36.69660   63  0.559  0.603
  42  17  6528  3 MASSACH    1 MILLS  E.H.  0.653 -0.233   -31.21945   60  0.594  0.700
  43  17  8385  6 VERMONT  200 SEYMOUR  H.  0.666  0.745   -40.12521   81  0.609  0.728
  44  17  7108  3 MASSACH    1 OTIS  H.G.   0.668 -0.079   -16.04785   32  0.606  0.719
  45  17  5465  1 CONNECT  200 LANMAN  J.   0.710  0.538   -42.22849   78  0.582  0.577
  46  17  2549  5 RHODE I  200 DEWOLF  J.   0.913  0.409   -38.21036   69  0.575  0.681


Site Links

VOTEVIEW Blog
NOMINATE Data, Roll Call Data, and Software
Course Web Pages: University of Georgia (2010 - )
Course Web Pages: UC San Diego (2004 - 2010)
University of San Diego Law School (2005)
Course Web Pages: University of Houston (2000 - 2005)
Course Web Pages: Carnegie-Mellon University (1997 - 2000)
Analyzing Spatial Models of Choice and Judgment with R
Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting
Recent Working Papers
Analyses of Recent Politics
About This Website
K7MOA Log Books: 1960 - 2015
Bio of Keith T. Poole
Related Links