SENATE_16 Rank Ordering

The format of the rank order files is:


 1.  Rank
 2.  Congress Number
 3.  ICPSR ID Number:  5 digit code assigned by the ICPSR as 
                       corrected by Howard Rosenthal and myself.
 4.  State Code:  2 digit ICPSR State Code. 
 5.  Congressional District Number (if House)
 6.  State Name
 7.  Party Code:  100 = Dem., 200 = Repub. (See PARTY3.DAT)
 8.  Name of Member
 9.  First Dimension DW-NOMINATE Joint Scaling
10.  Second Dimension DW-NOMINATE Joint Scaling
11.  Log-Likelihood
12.  Total Choices this Congress
13.  Geometric Mean Probability
14.  Proportion Correctly Classified

Rank Orderings for all Houses and Senates Can be Found Here


   1  16 10235 12 NEW JER  200 WILSON  J.  -0.990 -0.140   -54.64656   61  0.408  0.410
   2  16  7953 14 PENNSYL  200 ROBERTS  J. -0.727 -0.343   -72.49787  105  0.501  0.600
   3  16  2828 54 TENNESS  200 EATON  J.H. -0.469  0.602   -67.47381  106  0.529  0.604
   4  16  5275 41 ALABAMA  200 KING  W.R.  -0.386 -0.045   -43.22255   97  0.640  0.794
   5  16  9740 44 GEORGIA  200 WALKER  F.  -0.359  0.133   -33.26259   87  0.682  0.885
   6  16  9749 41 ALABAMA  200 WALKER  J.  -0.323 -0.738   -35.09739  108  0.723  0.926
   7  16  5895 47 NORTH C  200 MACON  N.   -0.292 -0.956   -54.02588  111  0.615  0.739
   8  16  5748 51 KENTUCK  200 LOGAN  W.   -0.281  0.260   -20.88725   52  0.669  0.846
   9  16   420 40 VIRGINI  200 BARBOUR  J. -0.221 -0.236   -39.57511   93  0.653  0.817
  10  16 10182 46 MISSISS  200 WILLIAMS    -0.199 -0.201   -54.16681   99  0.579  0.697
  11  16  4988 51 KENTUCK  200 JOHNSON  R. -0.187 -0.014   -52.77489   85  0.537  0.718
  12  16  4532 46 MISSISS  200 HOLMES  D.  -0.152 -0.111   -17.10318   42  0.665  0.762
  13  16  5542 46 MISSISS  200 LEAKE  W.   -0.148  0.167   -28.97368   63  0.631  0.778
  14  16  3423 48 SOUTH C  200 GAILLARD    -0.135 -0.422   -46.12709  111  0.660  0.766
  15  16  8971 47 NORTH C  200 STOKES  M.  -0.128  0.297   -36.64649   93  0.674  0.839
  16  16  7463 52 MARYLAN  200 PINKNEY  W. -0.107  0.000   -12.53430   30  0.658  0.800
  17  16  2913 44 GEORGIA  200 ELLIOTT  J. -0.092 -0.370   -46.45869  100  0.628  0.730
  18  16  2871 21 ILLINOI  200 EDWARDS  N. -0.087  0.996   -31.56820   90  0.704  0.856
  19  16 10160 54 TENNESS  200 WILLIAMS    -0.085  0.146   -43.46394   98  0.642  0.816
  20  16  4959 45 LOUISIA  200 JOHNSON  H. -0.037  0.261   -38.13946  101  0.685  0.842
  21  16  9233 22 INDIANA  200 TAYLOR  W.  -0.005  0.463   -57.00912   97  0.556  0.691
  22  16  5724 52 MARYLAN  200 LLOYD  E.   -0.004 -0.312   -35.21735   54  0.521  0.648
  23  16  1111 45 LOUISIA  200 BROWN  J.    0.047  0.060   -32.74593   63  0.595  0.762
  24  16  2561 12 NEW JER  200 DICKERSON    0.113  0.119   -71.15115  100  0.491  0.560
  25  16  8211 13 NEW YOR  200 SANFORD  N.  0.127  0.179   -77.31180  108  0.489  0.583
  26  16  9159 51 KENTUCK  200 TALBOT  I.   0.173  0.728   -22.63466   45  0.605  0.711
  27  16  8694 48 SOUTH C  200 SMITH  W.    0.193 -0.981   -73.97676  108  0.504  0.611
  28  16  1635  2 MAINE    200 CHANDLER     0.196 -0.162   -32.10547   46  0.498  0.565
  29  16  7216  4 NEW HAM  200 PARROTT  J.  0.222  0.032   -45.97850  104  0.643  0.769
  30  16  9297 21 ILLINOI  200 THOMAS  J.   0.254  0.723   -38.22975  100  0.682  0.830
  31  16  6941 22 INDIANA  200 NOBLE  J.    0.273  0.863   -50.78933   82  0.538  0.610
  32  16  6693  4 NEW HAM  200 MORRIL  D.   0.372 -0.928   -48.49483   91  0.587  0.703
  33  16  9613 11 DELAWAR    1 VANDYKE  N.  0.421 -0.225   -38.49051   87  0.642  0.793
  34  16  9378  6 VERMONT    1 TICHENOR     0.431 -0.623   -32.29831   87  0.690  0.908
  35  16  8107 24 OHIO     200 RUGGLES  B.  0.440  0.898   -68.24610   99  0.502  0.596
  36  16  5339  5 RHODE I  200 KNIGHT  N.   0.502  0.346   -13.37322   32  0.658  0.750
  37  16  4762  5 RHODE I    1 HUNTER  W.   0.509 -0.121   -39.08379   96  0.666  0.802
  38  16  4586 11 DELAWAR    1 HORSEY  O.   0.536 -0.027   -36.80294   75  0.612  0.760
  39  16  7182  6 VERMONT  200 PALMER  W.   0.543  0.376   -46.54084   87  0.586  0.701
  40  16  9477 24 OHIO     200 TRIMBLE  W.  0.565  0.825   -57.63771  111  0.595  0.730
  41  16  5270 13 NEW YOR    1 KING  R.     0.583 -0.304   -44.97854  104  0.649  0.779
  42  16  5817 14 PENNSYL  200 LOWRIE  W.   0.619  0.534   -57.26821  111  0.597  0.694
  43  16  8752 12 NEW JER  200 SOUTHARD     0.626  0.593   -13.25448   25  0.588  0.680
  44  16  6528  3 MASSACH    1 MILLS  E.H.  0.653 -0.233   -19.15599   46  0.659  0.826
  45  16  7108  3 MASSACH    1 OTIS  H.G.   0.668 -0.079   -39.56969   96  0.662  0.823
  46  16  5465  1 CONNECT  200 LANMAN  J.   0.710  0.538   -45.96447  107  0.651  0.813
  47  16  6410  3 MASSACH    1 MELLEN  P.   0.731 -0.498   -15.01341   55  0.761  0.927
  48  16  1305  5 RHODE I    1 BURRILL  J.  0.734 -0.272   -18.23775   67  0.762  0.896
  49  16  2316  1 CONNECT    1 DANA  S.W.   0.782 -0.145   -40.05995  100  0.670  0.820


Site Links

VOTEVIEW Blog
NOMINATE Data, Roll Call Data, and Software
Course Web Pages: University of Georgia (2010 - )
Course Web Pages: UC San Diego (2004 - 2010)
University of San Diego Law School (2005)
Course Web Pages: University of Houston (2000 - 2005)
Course Web Pages: Carnegie-Mellon University (1997 - 2000)
Analyzing Spatial Models of Choice and Judgment with R
Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting
Recent Working Papers
Analyses of Recent Politics
About This Website
K7MOA Log Books: 1960 - 2015
Bio of Keith T. Poole
Related Links