SENATE_SORT16 Rank Ordering

The format of the rank order files is:


 1.  Rank
 2.  Congress Number
 3.  ICPSR ID Number:  5 digit code assigned by the ICPSR as 
                       corrected by Howard Rosenthal and myself.
 4.  State Code:  2 digit ICPSR State Code. 
 5.  Congressional District Number (if House)
 6.  State Name
 7.  Party Code:  100 = Dem., 200 = Repub. (See PARTY3.DAT)
 8.  Name of Member
 9.  First Dimension DW-NOMINATE Joint Scaling
10.  Second Dimension DW-NOMINATE Joint Scaling
11.  Log-Likelihood
12.  Total Choices this Congress
13.  Geometric Mean Probability
14.  Proportion Correctly Classified

Rank Orderings for all Houses and Senates Can be Found Here


   1  16 10235 12 NEW JER  200 WILSON  J.  -0.995 -0.102   -54.02171   61  0.412  0.393
   2  16  7953 14 PENNSYL  200 ROBERTS  J. -0.750 -0.381   -71.63683  105  0.505  0.619
   3  16  2828 54 TENNESS  200 EATON  J.H. -0.475  0.609   -68.09830  106  0.526  0.585
   4  16  5275 41 ALABAMA  200 KING  W.R.  -0.386 -0.045   -43.32008   97  0.640  0.784
   5  16  9740 44 GEORGIA  200 WALKER  F.  -0.353  0.038   -32.84829   87  0.686  0.874
   6  16  9749 41 ALABAMA  200 WALKER  J.  -0.343 -0.766   -34.92263  108  0.724  0.917
   7  16  5748 51 KENTUCK  200 LOGAN  W.   -0.295  0.217   -20.76074   52  0.671  0.808
   8  16  5895 47 NORTH C  200 MACON  N.   -0.291 -0.957   -54.05442  111  0.614  0.730
   9  16   420 40 VIRGINI  200 BARBOUR  J. -0.229 -0.231   -39.44420   93  0.654  0.828
  10  16 10182 46 MISSISS  200 WILLIAMS    -0.198 -0.194   -54.60263   99  0.576  0.697
  11  16  4988 51 KENTUCK  200 JOHNSON  R. -0.187 -0.014   -52.17056   85  0.541  0.729
  12  16  4532 46 MISSISS  200 HOLMES  D.  -0.148 -0.094   -16.94167   42  0.668  0.810
  13  16  5542 46 MISSISS  200 LEAKE  W.   -0.141  0.182   -28.69613   63  0.634  0.794
  14  16  3423 48 SOUTH C  200 GAILLARD    -0.135 -0.422   -45.70122  111  0.663  0.766
  15  16  8971 47 NORTH C  200 STOKES  M.  -0.132  0.286   -36.46501   93  0.676  0.828
  16  16  7463 52 MARYLAN  200 PINKNEY  W. -0.109  0.022   -12.65520   30  0.656  0.800
  17  16  2913 44 GEORGIA  200 ELLIOTT  J. -0.105 -0.373   -45.61702  100  0.634  0.730
  18  16  2871 21 ILLINOI  200 EDWARDS  N. -0.091  0.996   -32.04156   90  0.700  0.867
  19  16 10160 54 TENNESS  200 WILLIAMS    -0.085  0.146   -42.91836   98  0.645  0.816
  20  16  4959 45 LOUISIA  200 JOHNSON  H. -0.037  0.261   -38.08562  101  0.686  0.842
  21  16  5724 52 MARYLAN  200 LLOYD  E.    0.006 -0.314   -35.34576   54  0.520  0.648
  22  16  9233 22 INDIANA  200 TAYLOR  W.   0.012  0.454   -58.33948   97  0.548  0.691
  23  16  1111 45 LOUISIA  200 BROWN  J.    0.043  0.043   -32.86993   63  0.593  0.746
  24  16  2561 12 NEW JER  200 DICKERSON    0.123  0.120   -70.40638  100  0.495  0.570
  25  16  8211 13 NEW YOR  200 SANFORD  N.  0.137  0.180   -75.86749  108  0.495  0.565
  26  16  9159 51 KENTUCK  200 TALBOT  I.   0.166  0.722   -22.76218   45  0.603  0.711
  27  16  1635  2 MAINE    200 CHANDLER     0.198 -0.173   -32.14643   46  0.497  0.609
  28  16  8694 48 SOUTH C  200 SMITH  W.    0.219 -0.976   -73.58408  108  0.506  0.639
  29  16  7216  4 NEW HAM  200 PARROTT  J.  0.232  0.030   -46.25895  104  0.641  0.779
  30  16  9297 21 ILLINOI  200 THOMAS  J.   0.246  0.712   -38.94978  100  0.677  0.790
  31  16  6941 22 INDIANA  200 NOBLE  J.    0.273  0.828   -51.29470   82  0.535  0.598
  32  16  6693  4 NEW HAM  200 MORRIL  D.   0.405 -0.914   -48.31629   91  0.588  0.725
  33  16  9613 11 DELAWAR    1 VANDYKE  N.  0.414 -0.227   -39.00200   87  0.639  0.782
  34  16  9378  6 VERMONT    1 TICHENOR     0.441 -0.598   -32.86832   87  0.685  0.885
  35  16  8107 24 OHIO     200 RUGGLES  B.  0.441  0.898   -67.85067   99  0.504  0.596
  36  16  5339  5 RHODE I  200 KNIGHT  N.   0.509  0.353   -13.77355   32  0.650  0.781
  37  16  4762  5 RHODE I    1 HUNTER  W.   0.519 -0.119   -39.62577   96  0.662  0.813
  38  16  4586 11 DELAWAR    1 HORSEY  O.   0.531 -0.034   -37.10353   75  0.610  0.760
  39  16  7182  6 VERMONT  200 PALMER  W.   0.536  0.383   -46.51207   87  0.586  0.701
  40  16  9477 24 OHIO     200 TRIMBLE  W.  0.564  0.826   -57.85984  111  0.594  0.730
  41  16  5270 13 NEW YOR    1 KING  R.     0.588 -0.320   -45.02795  104  0.649  0.769
  42  16  5817 14 PENNSYL  200 LOWRIE  W.   0.616  0.530   -57.03797  111  0.598  0.712
  43  16  8752 12 NEW JER  200 SOUTHARD     0.636  0.594   -13.64204   25  0.579  0.680
  44  16  6528  3 MASSACH    1 MILLS  E.H.  0.643 -0.233   -19.60843   46  0.653  0.804
  45  16  7108  3 MASSACH    1 OTIS  H.G.   0.668 -0.079   -39.65797   96  0.662  0.813
  46  16  5465  1 CONNECT  200 LANMAN  J.   0.714  0.547   -45.82389  107  0.652  0.804
  47  16  6410  3 MASSACH    1 MELLEN  P.   0.730 -0.468   -15.27250   55  0.758  0.927
  48  16  1305  5 RHODE I    1 BURRILL  J.  0.744 -0.271   -17.98561   67  0.765  0.896
  49  16  2316  1 CONNECT    1 DANA  S.W.   0.772 -0.143   -40.57559  100  0.666  0.830


Site Links

VOTEVIEW Blog
NOMINATE Data, Roll Call Data, and Software
Course Web Pages: University of Georgia (2010 - )
Course Web Pages: UC San Diego (2004 - 2010)
University of San Diego Law School (2005)
Course Web Pages: University of Houston (2000 - 2005)
Course Web Pages: Carnegie-Mellon University (1997 - 2000)
Analyzing Spatial Models of Choice and Judgment with R
Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting
Recent Working Papers
Analyses of Recent Politics
About This Website
K7MOA Log Books: 1960 - 2015
Bio of Keith T. Poole
Related Links