POLI 100B CONGRESS
21 February 2006

- Congressional Elections
- Midterm Loss of Seats for the President's Party

Bush 2000 47.9%, Republicans 2002 49.6%, Gained 6 Seats House, 2 Seats Senate
- Voter Turnout (Voting Age) 1930 - 2000

- Voter Turnout (Eligible) 1788 - 2004

- Trust in Government 1952 - 2004

- Figure 5.3 (Stewart) - Turnout and Winning Percentage of the
Vote - House Elections 1994 and 1996

- Voters, Candidates, and Issues (Erikson and Wright, Ch. 4 D & O)
- Partisanship and Seats Shares

- Spending Preferences from NPAT surveys: 2002 and 1998


- Issue Differences by Political Party from NPAT surveys: 2002 and 1998


- Constraint -- Issues are bundled together!
- Distribution of Candidate Ideology by Party, 2002 and 1998



- The Incumbency Advantage in the House: 2002 and 1998




- Challenger Quality: 2002 and 1998


- Candidate Ideology by District Presidential Vote: 2002 and 1998


- Member Ideology and the House Vote: 2002 and 1998


- Winning Candidate's Ideology by District Presidential Vote: 2002 and 1998



- Voter's Perceptions of the Ideology of their Representative: 1978 - 2002


- Stewart Chapter 5 -- Voter Choices
- Table 5.2 -- Probability of Voting as a Function of House Candidate Evaluations, 1994

- Table 5.4 -- Party and Ideological Distance as Explanatory Factors in 1994 House Elections

- Table 5.5 -- Ideological Extremity of Voters in 1994, by Interest in Politics

- Figure 5.6 -- Richard Fenno's Concept of Nested Constituencies

- Progressive Ambition
- State Hierarchy: Governor > State Legislator > Local Official
- Federal Hierarchy: President > Senator > Representative
- Prior Careers of the MA Delegation
to the House, 91st Congress (1969 - 1971)

- Factors That Affect the Calculus of Progressive Ambition

- Challenger Quality
